Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wabdl canadian bench press records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - WP:NOT#STATS Black Kite 18:32, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wabdl canadian bench press records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information or statistics, see WP:NOT#STATS, only references are to the organization itself. Terrillja _talk 19:59, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note also note similar list: WABDL Canadian Deadlift Records--Terrillja _talk 20:02, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - poorly formatted, but that's not a deletion criterion. Other allegations simply don't check out. WilyD 14:28, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOT#STATS, plus it lacks reliable independent sources to establish notability.--Boffob (talk) 16:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 06:08, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 06:08, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:59, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep but the article needs to be reworked by an experienced editor. My only concern over notability is that the records are Canadian, and only for a particular organization. The article should be renamed to proper capitalization (WABDL Canadian bench press records). - Richard Cavell (talk) 05:31, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP - Ever since ancient Greece Strength Data has been very important. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.82.151.229 (talk) 18:40, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 24.82.151.229 (talk) 18:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP - Especially if the info on this articles Discussion Page is added to this Article.24.82.151.229 (talk) 21:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Even were it to be prettily formatted, there are no WP:RS including what is noted on the talk page. DOUBLEBLUE (talk) 07:46, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.