Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victorian (comics)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Victorian (comics)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I ran into this one when participating in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penny-Farthing Press, as it was suggested that article could be redirected here. However, actually looking into this article, I don't believe this comic is notable itself. The only reviews included are all from the same defunct website, which per the WP:GNG, would only count as a single source for establishing notability. And when I performed various searches, I found pretty much no coverage in reliable sources regarding the series. The most I found were very brief mentions in lists of things that Len Wein had worked on. Without significant coverage in reliable sources, it fails the WP:GNG. Rorshacma (talk) 20:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 20:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article is just a catalogue entry, notability is not show, just the existence of the topic. Ping me if sources showing notability are found. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus. Mooonswimmer 14:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mooonswimmer I appreciate your support, but do check WP:KEEPER. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:26, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agreed, WP:GNG specifies it needs multiple reliable sources, which this doesn't have. Belichickoverbrady (talk) 18:33, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sourcing fails the criteria for establishing notability as per nom. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:05, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.