Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VfB Stuttgart kits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 12:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

VfB Stuttgart kits (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTGALLERY. Discussed before in 2018 (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFC Ajax kit history), and furthermore in 2007 (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery of Bradford City kits). As the result, there are several pages like this in Commons, either made by me or not. This page belongs there. Flix11 (talk) 04:10, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Flix11 (talk) 04:10, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:29, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:54, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:55, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 09:09, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NOTGALLERY. A summary of the club's kit history can be included in the main article (it may well be there already, I haven't checked). There is no need for an article which consists of images of endless minor variations on the same basic colour scheme -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:20, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and previous AFD consensus. GiantSnowman 09:51, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Overly detailed for an encyclopedia. Nigej (talk) 11:06, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all of the above Spiderone 17:26, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom Devokewater (talk) 14:24, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.