Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/US F1 Type 1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to US F1 Team. I will redirect, leaving editors free to merge pertinent material. Non-admin closure. Jujutacular ^T · C 15:45, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

US F1 Type 1

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The US F1 Team has ceased operations on building this car. It will not be finished or compete in the 2010 Formula One season. [1] [2] Any useful information can be salvaged in the US F1 Team article. --Midgrid (talk) 12:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update: The FIA has released the official 2010 entry list without US F1. [3]--Midgrid (talk) 21:40, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Cs-wolves (talk) 12:45, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Tubefurnace (talk) 12:57, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, or Redirect to US F1 Team, as a completed Type 1 doesn't appear it will see the light of day. --TreyGeek (talk) 14:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge to US F1 Team - there doesn't appear to be much which can be saved here, but if anyone feels the information shouldn't be deleted it should be merged to the team's article. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 16:37, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to US F1 Team. I agree that it might not merit it's own article, but we should keep the information. 83.161.196.242 (talk) 18:12, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The team that never was just about rates a short article on notability grounds, but the non-existent car does not. Little to nothing has ever been written on the car, and now never will be. Merge anything worth saving - but the only bit of real information in the article about the car as opposed to the team is that it was to have a transverse gearbox, and a year from now I doubt even the most rabid F1 fan (me, for example) will care. 4u1e (talk) 18:16, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The car was never fully-built. Had it been, it could have an article as I believe there is a precedent here (with DAMS maybe?). Merge anything important to US F1 Team. It should not have been created until launch anyway. - mspete93 18:26, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment To be fair it may, like the DAMS and several others, pop up in a future book on "F1 cars that never raced", but until it does... 4u1e (talk) 19:53, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to US F1 Team, rather than delete outright. The information is relevant but not on it's own article. The³5₉ (Talk) 23:07, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to US F1 Team, per The359 and others. DH85868993 (talk) 02:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to the team article. It's part of the history of the team. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 06:41, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to US F1 Team, then re-edit. There's very little here of note, but USF1 is worth an entry, and some of this info might be worth having.Tubefurnace (talk) 19:38, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.