Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.S. Jones

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Fox Feature Syndicate#Fox characters. History is available if anyone believes there is content that should be merged. RL0919 (talk) 22:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've prodded this last yaer with "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar.". While it has been improved, I am afraid this hasn't been sufficient - the article is still just a publication history and plot summary, with zero evidence of significance (no reception, analysis, etc.). The only evidence of wider context is a sentence in the lead that describes the phenomane of WWII-era US patriotic superheroes (a likely notable topic), but that doesn't mean all such superheroes are notable. Some certainly are, but this one I am afraid does not. I recommend SOFTDELETE and redirecting to Fox_Feature_Syndicate#Fox_characters, maybe a small merge too. But unless we can find a reception of this that meets WP:SIGCOV and goes beyond one-two sentences of plot summary (as in the sources cited), I am afraid there is no compelling reason to keep this as a stand-alone entry (interestingly, it seems there is more coverage of its collectibe pinback button than of the chracter itself...). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, I support the OP's suggestion that it be redirected to Fox_Feature_Syndicate#Fox_characters, while the sourced content should be merged into the appropriate page. Perhaps something about the collective pinback button can be put on the appropriate page as well. --Historyday01 (talk) 12:58, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Goldsztajn (talk) 07:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.