Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuomas Kaukua

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 02:27, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tuomas Kaukua

Tuomas Kaukua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage that's not just a WP:PASSINGMENTION, fails GNG. ––FormalDude (talk) 01:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Finland. ––FormalDude (talk) 02:05, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:13, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Finnish language sourcing is a lot of brief mentions in game reports (along the lines of "Kaukua scored...", with perhaps a one-sentence quote), with the most extensive piece I could find being this Yle Uutiset story. Might have scraped by with the old, now-removed, sports criteria, but I'm not seeing the prerequisite sourcing to establish notability for the presently used criteria. -Ljleppan (talk) 10:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails WP:NSPORT and WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 19:03, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 21:41, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence of notability. YLE source good but not enough on its own. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 09:48, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Article appears to fail WP:GNG without significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Jogurney (talk) 14:25, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.