Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trophy of Denmark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trophy of Denmark

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not clear what sport it is, no context, no sources, hardly any internet hits. Fails WP:GNG Night of the Big Wind _talk 11:58, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Another table hockey entry from TH guru. No media coverage. Not notable. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:56, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:12, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Major tournament for a sport, just needs formatting cleanup. Also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/World_Championships_%28Table_Hockey%29 for my other arguement.GuzzyG (talk) 11:52, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:20, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - obscure tournament in an obscure game (not sport) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:53, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑Scottywong | soliloquize _ 23:50, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Setting aside whether this is a sport or a game, there is no coverage that I am able to find that establishes that this is a notable tournament. -- Whpq (talk) 14:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.