Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristan Hodge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:36, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tristan Hodge

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, lacks WP:SIGCOV. This source would be more than a trivial mention [1], but that is still not enough to satisfy either criteria. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:27, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Caribbean. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:27, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I found these sources which show he is notable in Trinidad and Tobago and USA: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21. In addition, he is a 16-time internationally capped player with an ongoing fully professional career, and is mentioned in countless match reports and videos. I feel like the nominator specifically tries to delete only football articles en masse for no reason. I look at the other sports WikiProjects and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 08:07, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 08:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources above which show notability (although not all are SIGCOV) - needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 08:57, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep enough of the sources listed above are WP:SIGCOV, so he passes WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, clearly passes GNG, lazy BEFORE.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:55, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Passes GNG. Simione001 (talk) 03:47, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.