Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Windle (baseball)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:06, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Windle (baseball)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There was some strangeness regarding PRODs and redirects in late 2020, so bringing this to AfD - no issue if this is redirected. I agree with the PROD: non-notable minor league baseball player, fails WP:NBASE/WP:GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 16:28, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 16:28, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 16:28, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 16:28, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 16:28, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable minor league player. Can be restored if he is ever called up.-- Yankees10 17:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Doesn't meet any of the WP:NBASE criteria. And other than being traded around by some teams, not many sources about him to meet WP:GNG. Agree with Yankees10 to be restored if he ever reaches the majors. RolledOut34 // (talk) // (cont) 00:22, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Only articles about him are trades and college statistics. If he plays games in the majors in the future the article can be restored.WP:TOOSOON. Mukedits (talk) 19:33, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Coverage is passing mention in transfers and databases, nothing at all demonstrating GNG. JoelleJay (talk) 02:19, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.