Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tibor Fülöp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:42, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tibor Fülöp

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

His 8 mins of professional football allowed his article to be created as he technically meets WP:NFOOTBALL. When it comes to WP:GNG, which ultimately Fülöp must be able to pass, I couldn't find any reasonable coverage. A Hungarian search was made difficult as his name is so common in Hungary. Working with his profiles on HLSZ and MLSZ, I found an exhaustive list of the clubs that he has played for. I then performed searches in conjunction with these clubs to narrow down the results.

My conclusion is that the best sources about him are an extremely brief injury announcement, a match report and appearing in a list of players released by a club. This is not significant coverage, therefore, I propose that we delete the article from Wikipedia for failing our notability standards for biographies. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:27, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:31, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Sonofstar (talk) 16:20, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.