Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Di Pauli
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sarahj2107 (talk) 20:56, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thomas Di Pauli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 07:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:04, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:04, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - There are several articles about this player to meet GNG, e.g., [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. Some but not all of these are motivated by a transaction - his free agent signing with the Penguins - but even the transaction motivated ones are full articles with significant information about the player beyond merely reporting the transaction (which would be routine coverage). Rlendog (talk) 22:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:39, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:39, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Rlendog has provided sources to pass GNG. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 17:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Sources have been added Eccekevin (talk) 04:28, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.