Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ski Tour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Ski Tour

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete as promotional material. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 23:39, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't know why you insist on calling the article promotional. Perhaps it's because WSQ declined your speedy tag as non-promotional? Whose Your Guy (talk) 20:55, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have added some sources that establish the notability of this tour Whose Your Guy (talk) 20:43, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have improved the article somewhat I'll grant you, but the tour itinerary reads like something that you should be getting off the company's webpage or newsletter.

Yes, WSQ disagreed with me about a speedy delete, so what? Now I get to hear from my peers (hopefully more will chime in). Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 00:01, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:07, 30 December 2010 (UTC)The Ski Tour[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:01, 6 January 2011 (UTC)The Ski Tour[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:34, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops. Sorry about that. Thanks! Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 19:19, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.