Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Shipyard District, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to Shipyard District. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:13, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Shipyard District, Inc.

The Shipyard District, Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

poorly defined district in a city-- non-notable DGG ( talk ) 08:44, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:40, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:40, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Some of this could be merged into the main Green Bay article - not the name of individuals, but an explanation of what the loss of the shipyard and other transitions mean for local businesses and how they are responding, both within the boundaries of this district and elsewhere. The festival might also be worth mentioning, particularly if it was a success and is likely to be repeated. What the article doesn't say is that The Shipyard District, Inc. appears to be a business improvement area that taxes local businesses to pay for amenities like better benches and street lighting as well as the festival -- not a new idea, but I guess it's new in Green Bay. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 11:06, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• delete There is no major coverage because it was founded in 2021. Some material may move to the Green Bay page, but by and large this is still an obscure zone. If it prospers and gets lots of mentions the next 2-3 years, let them rebuild the page. Ode+Joy (talk) 22:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to Shipyard District and refocus - there has been plenty of coverage of the location (which is a populated place and so is notable per WP:GEOLAND anyway), its redevelopment, and various associated events. The organisation responsible for the redevelopment and management (a private organisation, not a statutory body) is not notable, in my view. St★lwart¹¹¹ 03:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to ping DGG, Eastmain and Ode+Joy just to ask if they see sense in that alternative. I'm happy to do the work to refocus the article; we have a similar situation at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Port of Poulsbo and the work there was not too difficult. St★lwart¹¹¹ 05:09, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• If you want to manage the move, please go for it. I have no objection, and you have my support. Ode+Joy (talk) 12:28, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to Shipyard District and recast as neighborhood/redevelopment area.Djflem (talk) 03:53, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• We are usually fairly restrictive about named districts within cities--the idea is to not include those that have no existence outside the real estate industry. I'd have to see the refs. You can always try. DGG ( talk ) 06:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - can now safely be moved per WP:HEY following Djflem's outstanding work. St★lwart¹¹¹ 23:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Move per Djflem's great work. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 02:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.