Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Girl Bunnies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:34, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Girl Bunnies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has no RS...sources are all web links, many of which are broken. Prelim search only turns up lots of YouTube-type hits. Aside from a few list-links, article is basically an ORPHAN. Written by a SPA, whose 7th edit was creating this article. Related article Françoise Doherty has the same issues. Agricola44 (talk) 17:08, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nomination. What sources there are mainly tie back to self-published material. GetSomeUtah (talk) 22:25, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:40, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:40, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:40, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:40, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:40, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. fails Gng. L3X1 (distænt write) 01:40, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 02:49, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.