Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Emperor's New Groove (franchise)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This should be treated as a WP:PROD deletion because there are no meaningful "delete" or "keep" opinions on offer. The one "keep" opinion seems to incorrectly assume that this is the article about the movie, and for the "delete" opinion see WP:JNN  Sandstein  08:10, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Emperor's New Groove (franchise) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A number of these being created of late. No sources to indicate the "franchise" itself is notable, just a summary culled from various other articles and non-notable topics. Doesn't serve much more purpose than a disambiguation page or navigation box (see {{The Emperor's New Groove}}). StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 17:45, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 17:45, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To add context to this discussion, these are the other franchise articles for Walt Disney Animation Studios films (plus the Pixar ones):--Coin945 (talk) 13:35, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 21:26, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sigh, really not notable.Forbidden User (talk) 17:54, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:42, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.