Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Away End

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 13:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Away End

No reliable external sources provided to pass WP:N. Non-notable internet based magazine about Scottish football. Article appears to be for promotional purposes. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 16:49, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as nominator. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 16:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:05, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:05, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:05, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now. Can't find anything in Ghits or Gnews to establish notability. The number of interviews with Scottish footballers looks promising, as is the move to a printed magazine as well as the web version, but I don't see evidence of notability just yet. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The page is not set up in a proper wikipedia page due to lack of knowledge of how to do that. However, I would argue over how notable the magazine is, as it has set up good links with most of the major clubs in Scotland, and its popularity is ever growing with a number of news agencies covering the story - only one of these links has been posted to the page so far however I can find and add them if you wish. 84.71.194.242 (talk) 20:15, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I would concentrate on posting links to coverage by news agencies. If you can find enough, that may save the page from deletion. Be aware, however, that it is rare for a publication that has been in existence for a few months to have enough coverage to be notable. The other option is to copy the page over to your own user space, wait for further media coverage, and repost the article once there is enough to make it notable. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 21:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Giant Snowman 00:12, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, non-notable fanzine. Giant Snowman 00:13, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no coverage to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:55, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, no notability I can see.--ClubOranje^T 09:38, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.