Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teri Sue Wood
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE, per Cryptic. -Splash - tk 16:16, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Teri Sue Wood
- Teri Sue Wood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
NN comic book writer, unverified stub. Delete per WP:ATT and WP:N K@ngiemeep! 21:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete. I had placed the tags on this article a couple days ago when I came across it. It's something of a newer article and I wanted to give the contributors a bit of time to develop it (hence why I tagged it instead of nominating it) but fundamentally agree that it fails inclusion standards as it stands. Arkyan • (talk) 21:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I woulda left it to gather dust before AfDing this too, except for the fact that the comics she created were recently recently AfD'd for notability and sourcing reasons-K@ngiemeep!
- Keep Notable enough for me and of interest to many people. Xanucia 22:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep[[1]] a google search quickly shows refrences, comics she has worked on, created etc. --Xiahou 00:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions. -- -- Ben 23:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and add citations of her work in Amazing Heroes and Wandering Star. I'm sure Wandering Star was reviewed in The Comics Journal at some point, which should be sufficient for her (and her work) to pass WP:NOTE. I don't personally care enough to find those citations, but she's certainly attributable (even if not yet attributed). —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 08:51, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Article could be cleaned up, but it should not be deleted. --Darth Borehd 01:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unsourced substub. No prejudice against a proper article, but this ain't it. —Cryptic 01:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Unsourced article in violation of WP:LIVING. Jerry 22:37, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.