Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terence Goodall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:15, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Terence Goodall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per BLP one event. To explain:

The subject is only known for one event: he was accused of sexual assault by two people and convicted of indecent assault in relation to one of them, effectively for having homosexual sex irrespective of consent. He was covered in a second story, in 2008, but in this story Goodall was only a peripheral player - his case was covered in relation to George Pell's handling of sexual abuse allegations and Pell's response, but the coverage was firmly about Pell, and related to the previously mentioned event.
Second, I've looked for anything with which to balance the article, but it's just not there. He has only ever been in the news due to the one case (either directly or peripherally).

Bilby (talk) 02:15, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:05, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:05, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 01:28, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A classic WP:BLP1E. --Mkativerata (talk) 03:28, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cirt (talk) 04:40, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver seren^C 18:52, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have listed this article for rescue. I have also added more EL's. Silverseren^C 18:52, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- What is there to rescue? No-one is arguing this isn't sourced well enough. Its a BLP1E issue. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:17, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To see if anyone else in the Squadron can find sources other than about this event. Silver seren^C 19:19, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this is the sort of thing that BLP1E was designed for. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:23, 24 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per BLP1E. --Nuujinn (talk) 17:01, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.