Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tennis at the 2017 Commonwealth Youth Games
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to 2017 Commonwealth Youth Games. There is a slight consensus (4-2) that this should not - as it stands - be a stand-alone article. Black Kite (talk) 10:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Tennis at the 2017 Commonwealth Youth Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One sentence, one source article with a lot of stats. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. The content can be summarized on the main article. - MrX 11:46, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:56, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:56, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete – not even close to a notable event. Doesn't need a separate article as medalists can easily be listed on main 2017 Commonwealth Youth Games article. Adamtt9 (talk) 13:38, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Procedural keep There is longstanding consensus to have such articles ("X at the Y games", "Country at Y games" etc.). This consensus can change of course but AFD is not the right forum to do so and deleting a single entry out of hundreds or thousands of such articles will most likely be disruptive. I urge the closing admin to consider this when assessing the discussion and I urge MrX to start a discussion at the appropriate venues before bringing more such articles to AFD. If they really all fail WP:NOTSTATS, they can all be deleted together, not one by one, overwhelming this already overwhelmed process. Regards SoWhy 10:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Does anyone else agree with SoWhy's argument to retain the article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Does anyone else agree with SoWhy's argument to retain the article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Not at all convinced by the WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. If this event isn't notable enough to justify a fork from the main event, then we shouldn't fork it. ~ Rob13Talk 01:18, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Per a quick google search there are plenty of GNG sources. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:50, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Per WP:CONTENTFORK, sources are not the only thing that matters. As an aside, I'd love to see that Google search. I have a feeling you're conflating results from tennis at the Commonwealth Games (very notable) with tennis at the Commonwealth Youth Games (doubtful notability as standalone from the games themselves). ~ Rob13Talk 07:53, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Actually no, I know my multi-sports events, and its borderline offensive to even suggest that. Tennis has only been held at the Commonwealth Games once (in 2010). The sources that are pulling up in Google News is going to be recent and not from 2010. Sources [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] and [8] Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:44, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Last relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix (talk) 16:19, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Last relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix (talk) 16:19, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.