Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team PCB

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. The Bushranger One ping only 02:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Team PCB

Team PCB (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was a shortlived alliance between singles wrestlers, and they didn't accomplish anything of note as a team. Like "Team Bella" or "Cryme Tyme Cenation", these types of shortlived alliances shouldn't have their own articles as it's mostly content forking the singles accomplishments and feud information. Y2AJ is an on point example of a shortlived alliance that led to a feud which doesn't deserve its own article. The three months these wrestlers were together did not include anything notable for a separate entity in the encyclopedia. Feedback 00:30, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:52, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. JTP (talkcontribs) 19:15, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - only WP:ROUTINE results. Team B.A.D. could probably go for the same reason. Nikki311 23:55, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete They have done nothing of note, therefore fails WP:ENT which is our guideline per WP:NSPORT. - GalatzTalk 01:45, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The only thing that could be deemed notable is the teams' forced name change from Submission Society, and the connotations. I understand there are no hard and fast rules around teams and if they deserve their own spot; but ones that last less than a year, need to really do something specific to be notible. Lee Vilenski(talk) 13:21, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The three members are obviously notable but that's WP:NOTINHERITED. This fails WP:GNG, everything useful is already in the three separate articles.LM2000 (talk) 15:04, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Nikki311's comment. Cocohead781 (talk) 23:42, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.