Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanner Price

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Randykitty (talk) 12:02, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tanner Price (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable athlete. Played amateur and one year in a low-level professional league, but no achievements that would establish WP:NCOLLATH or a professional guideline. Little, if any, in-depth coverage that would satisfy WP:GNG. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:28, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:28, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:28, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Aside from being a four-year starter at a decently big D-1 school, I think there are enough sources [1][2][3][4][5][6]-- Yankees10 01:13, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete All sports programs receive plenty of routine coverage in the sports media, I don't see this passing the notability guidelines. Reywas92^Talk 01:44, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No matter which way people try to put it, he doesn’t meet notability for an athlete here. Trillfendi (talk) 02:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep several of the sources provided by Yankees10 are feature articles from major news outlets, which is more than enough to pass WP:GNG. Not every college football athlete attains notability, but this one does.--Paul McDonald (talk) 06:16, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Per Yankees10 and Paul McDonald. There are stories (including those cited by Yankees10) focused on Price (i.e., "significant coverage") in multiple, reliable, independent sources. Some of those sources are national in scope, such as CBS Sports and ESPN. Accordingly, he passes WP:GNG and likely prong 3 of WP:NCOLLATH as well. Cbl62 (talk) 15:26, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Meets WP:GNG, per Yankees10's sources. Ejgreen77 (talk) 00:17, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - GNG satisfied by the sources, so SNG is irrelevant. Nosebagbear (talk) 22:24, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:RELISTINGISEVIL consensus is clear on this one.--Paul McDonald (talk) 15:40, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep passes WP:NCOLLATH with national feature article coverage on CBS Sports and ESPN. SportingFlyer T·C 23:26, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.