Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamara Barykova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 13:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tamara Barykova (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient notability for this project. Being a victim of oppression is deplorably common, and not in itself noteworthy. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:24, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:36, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: a two sentence article claiming subject is/was a student and a victim of religious oppression just won't do. Must be deleted anyway due to blatant copyright violations. If anyone wishes to recreate they will have to start from scratch. Quis separabit? 19:59, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rms125a@hotmail.com, the article was previously longer, and is now very short because I have removed the copyright violation (unless you see something that I have missed?). So copyvio in itself is, I believe, no longer a reason to delete the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:02, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:20, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:20, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:27, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I cannot read Russian, so it's unlikely I will offer an !vote. Searching for a possible redirect, I found Anti-Catholicism in the Soviet Union (which is obviously not applicable) but I cannot find Anti-Catholicism in Russia or an equivalent. -Location (talk) 00:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I'm not sure language matters much here because "being a student and a victim of religious repression" is not a claim to notability. Agricola44 (talk) 15:16, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• If that's all there is, then you're right. But I would need to be able to read Russian to know if there was more. -Location (talk) 21:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I ran a search, but I can't source it.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Might fit in the Soviet article, as this individual was born in 1914 and the revolution was in 1917. So possible the oppression occurred in that era, we just don't have enough. I've pinged a wikipedian who speaks Russian to peek at the sources. Let's stay tuned to see what, if anything comes up. Montanabw^(talk) 18:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, unless expanded to a proper article that provides some context for its claims. My guess is that this does refer to USSR, not imperial Russia. If born in 1914 and a student she (or he) would have been 20 in 1934 at the time of Stalin's purges. USSR tried to control the church by trying to het the Catholic Church to unite with the Orthodox Church over which the state exercised considerable control. Its claims are potentially credible, but whether they are true or not, I cannot know. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:41, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough for a standalone. Possibly merge to Persecution of Christians in the Soviet Union, Eastern Catholic victims of Soviet persecutions, Anti-Catholicism in the Soviet Union, USSR anti-religious campaign (1928–1941) or a list article if there is one - she appears to be one in a long list.Icewhiz (talk) 14:53, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.