Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. G. Sangram Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

T. G. Sangram Singh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doubtful notability, most coverage seems to be related to the stamp paper scam, and the article seems to be devoted to countering that. It actually seems to come close to G11. It is largely unsourced. It is also full of irrelevant information, like details about some film that he apparently liked and how often he watched it, and details on the children of his adopted daughter. To say that it would need a rewrite would be quite accurate, and that's assuming that the subject is even notable. Anyway, I am calling for WP:TNT regardless of notability, to ensure that the current version cannot just be reverted back to. Mako001 (C) (T) 07:40, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Mako001 (C) (T) 07:40, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Mako001 (C) (T) 07:40, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Mako001 (C) (T) 07:40, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:54, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE as fails WP:GNG. Not a notable police officer, not citation is there to verify the claims made on the Wiki page. Moreover, the Assistant Commissioner of Police is middle class police officer. --NeverTry4Me - TT page 07:53, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.