Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Szabolcs Csordás
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 10:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Szabolcs Csordás (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only very narrowly meets WP:NFOOTBALL due to 9 minutes of top tier football. Also supported here. A Hungarian search only found trivial coverage like this and this. There is now very, very clear consensus that comprehensively failing WP:GNG is far more important than passing NFOOTBALL on just a few mins of playing. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:52, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:52, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:52, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:53, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - fails GNG, which is far more important than a technical scraping by with one appearance on NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 18:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete it is cases like this that show that our current football notability guidelines are way too broad.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:57, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.