Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Iftquar Hussain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 23:46, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Iftquar Hussain

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Syed Iftquar Hussain does not satisfy mixed martial arts notability, any other part of sports notability, or general notability. An article should speak for itself and should state how the subject is notable. Nothing in this article as written addresses any of the points of any section of sports notability, and there is no discussion of significant coverage such as would be necessary for general notability Robert McClenon (talk) 06:54, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:54, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sun8908 _Talk 07:57, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not appear notable as per the above. Item was declined at review and subsequently moved to mainspace without improvement. 'Google' search seems to reveal only own website and social-media results. Eagleash (talk) 08:02, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:26, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no indication of WP notability. Neither the article nor my own search shows any accomplishments that meet any sports notability criteria and there doesn't appear to be any significant independent coverage. Belonging to organizations, his own web page, and social media all fail to make a case for notability. Papaursa (talk) 03:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with extreme prejudice. There's clearly a COI problem, and the article is effectively unsourced, but I think there's more to it — could it be a hoax of some sort? Makes wild claims about multiple national and international championships, yet a search nets nothing more than social media hits, and not many of them, even. Anyway, as per nom, fails every definition of notability. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:41, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt, as per the concerns raised by DoubleGrazing. Fails WP:GNG and the SNG's. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.