Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swat lynching incident
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to List of blasphemy cases in Pakistan. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Swat lynching incident
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Swat lynching incident (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Horrible and highly condemnable incident but fails NEVENT. WP is not newspaper. Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- I've merged the content into List of blasphemy cases in Pakistan to ensure that editors' efforts are not wasted. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:30, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Events. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Merge with List of blasphemy cases in Pakistan, per @Saqib's comment. Incident isn't WP:N enough to warrant an article. —Mjks28 (talk) 00:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per above. I mean it was already so in theory it can be redirected but, yes. PARAKANYAA (talk) 12:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete or Merge as per the above recomendation I do agree with the nominator's concern.223.123.10.196 (talk) 01:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep- There is a continued coverage about the incident. see. Mfarazbaig (talk) 13:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC) — Mfarazbaig (talk · contribs) is a confirmed [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/{{{2}}}|sock puppet]] of [{{canonicalurl:User:{{{2}}}}} {{{2}}}] ([[User talk:{{{2}}}|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/{{{2}}}|contribs]]).- Mfarazbaig, OK but WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE also states
coverage does not need to be ongoing for notability to be established, a burst or spike of news reports does not automatically make an incident notable.
— Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Mfarazbaig, OK but WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE also states
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak merge If the continued coverage is in some way transformative, as with Murder of Ahmaud Arbery, then a separate article might be merited. Is there a connection between this incident and larger social forces in Pakistan? Darkfrog24 (talk) 12:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.