Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Svein Tore Brandshaug

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Svein Tore Brandshaug

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article tagged with WP:N and WP:V concerns since 2012. My WP:Before checks suggest the article subject technically meets WP:NFOOTBALL, as he made a single 9-minute substitute appearance for Molde FK in 2002 when the Norwegian men's top division was allegedly 'fully-pro'. The bulk of his career was played out in the amateur lower divisions and there is accordingly scant coverage to support a claim to WP:GNG. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one appearance is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively. If sources are found which demonstrate GNG then please ping me. Giant Snowman 11:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - here is a Norwegian newspaper search. A lot of hits but not seeing a whole lot of detailed coverage of him specifically. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.