Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Gilbert (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:45, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Gilbert

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was deleted in 2013 due to lack of notability. It was recreated in 2014 and a 2015 AfD resulted in a "keep" decision. The 2015 AfD decision seems misguided in hindsight. Her entire notability hinges on one statement by her in a CNBC story. That is not substantial RS coverage. There is no RS coverage of her aside from being quoted once in a story from 2012, which is not even coverage of her. Thenightaway (talk) 11:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, and Women. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Yeah I don't get the last AfD either; she was interviewed, so she's notable? Regardless, I tried her name and "coffee", nothing turns up. I can't see anything we could use. Oaktree b (talk) 14:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No significant (in-depth) coverage. Note that 3 of the 4 of the "keep" comments from the 2015 AfD are from now-blocked users, including 2 sockpuppets. Neutrality^talk 02:11, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm not seeing any significant independant coverage to meet WP:GNG. I can't see enough in terms of reviews to warrant a pass of WP:NAUTHOR either, but would be happy to be proved wrong. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.