Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Gilbert (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 18:49, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Gilbert

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP article with no reliable sources whatsoever. BiH (talk) 11:27, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:19, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:19, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 23:30, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Easily fails WP:NOTABILITY. Lacks real WP:RS. --Jersey92 (talk) 02:48, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If she was interviewed in that many reliable sources she'd be notable. Did anyone bother to search those locations mentioned in the article? Plus the Writer's Digest could be notable. Dream Focus 15:49, 23 July 2014 (UTC) I couldn't find the Guardian article at all, but perhaps they don't archive things from that far back. She is quoted in various other news sources, asked for her opinions as an expert in her field. Highbeam search shows three mentions of her book, brief reviews there. [1] I'm thinking she is probably notable. Dream Focus 12:51, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't entirely agree with the nomination – San Diego Magazine seems like a reliable source and could go some way to establishing notability. But notability requires multiple sources, and that piece is far from the standard we require of sources in BLPs. Google doesn't turn up any news articles, profiles, book reviews etc. that could be any use. I'd be surprised if any of the interviews mentioned, assuming they exist, were in any greater depth than the brief mention by CNBC cited in the lede. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 02:27, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Interviews with CNBC, San Diego Magazine gives indication of notability. I agree with Dream Focus, the subject was interviewed with notable media sources.Anishwiki12 (talk) 03:12, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, She is quoted in various news sources. Highbeam search result, CNBC and other media sources gives indication of notablility. My decision will be keep. Ireneshih (talk) 05:12, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - WP:DIDEROT Jim-Siduri (talk) 04:37, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep More than sufficient refs. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 16:27, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.