Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudha Ruparell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm closing this a little early due to the very significant BLP considerations, DGG ( talk ) 22:54, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sudha Ruparell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Negative BLP with no convincing sources that she is really involved in the scandal mentioned in the article. The Banner _talk 16:59, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Was unable to find sources that show the article subject meets WP:BASIC. --j⚛e decker ^talk 17:41, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG, a few brief mentions is all that I could find. Also has issues with WP:BLPCRIME and WP:BLP1E, which would need to be overcome if further sourcing was discovered. 137.43.182.141 (talk) 17:46, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. —Ed!^(talk) 19:28, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.