Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports broadcasting contracts in Vietnam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by Nominator. no opinions to the contrary. Self close (non-admin closure) Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 15:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sports broadcasting contracts in Vietnam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Undersourced and underformatted list, this has been returned to draft once before by Discospinster eleven months ago. Since then it has languished with small enhancements only, prior to being moved from draft by one of its editors. My instinct was to draftily it, but doing that a second time without an AfD discussion is move warring. The elapsed time after the prior draftificaton does not, in my view, affect the move warring issue

My recommended outcome is to draftify after discussion. I do not see the need (so far) to delete this material. Worthy similar lists exist, but with sourcing and with excellence of formatting. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 13:00, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 14:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 14:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 14:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: The editor who moved it to maim space moved it back to draft. While this is a likely outcome of the discussion here it is not necessarily the outcome which will be determined at close time.. They removed the AfD notice. I have reinstated that notice, and moved it back to main space. While this may seem pedantic since the editor obviously wishes to edit it further, it may be edited as an article, and should be so edited.

At present there is a worrying trend of articles sent to AfD being moved swiftly (back?) to draft space, which feels to me to be seeking to game the system Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 14:41, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment an interesting counterpoint to the frequent comment of “take it to AfD” when you draftify something, to have something draftified to avoid AfD.Mccapra (talk) 15:47, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the past few weeks, I've seen this "moving article in AFD discussion to Draft space" occur at least 5 or 6 times. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I don't see any reason to delete this. While this article currently still working and updating, this article could be another contribute to the "Sports broadcasting contracts by country" list in Wikipedia. Comics Rovio (talk) 14:41, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• WITHDRAWN BY NOMINATOR: Sufficient references have been added to make deletion now not relevant. I will close this myself since no-one has offered a delete opini0n Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 15:03, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.