Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpectorDance Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:16, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SpectorDance Company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability under WP:GNG, WP:NARTIST, WP:NORG. No sources located on Google, GBooks, GNews, JSTOR, or Highbeam that were not simply routine local sources, leaving the appearance in the NEARTS journal as the only reliable source. Awards mentioned are not significant/notable enough to confer notability by themselves. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:41, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 14:26, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 14:26, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 15:44, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete How it was surviving without references? Fact is it was created long ago, ma have something from the industry but I didn't found anything on reliable dance networks. Mia Watson (talk) 15:16, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.