Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spacetoon (India)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 22:24, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spacetoon (India) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely a WP:HOAX. No reliable sources to indicate that Spacetoon has a branch / subsidiary in India. The website listed on this page does not exist. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:43, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This also needs to be deleted. List of programs broadcast by Spacetoon (Pakistan) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shinnosukeandme (talk • contribs) 11:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:55, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:55, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I don't think the article is a hoax, e.g., Business Standard has covered a channel named "Spacetoon Kids TV". I can't comment on its notability though. — Stringy Acid (talk) 20:14, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That article is about the Indian version, not the supposed Pakistani version. Nothing about an Pakistani version can be found on the internet except in this article.--Shinnosukeandme (talk) 05:31, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Both – Spacetoon India is not a hoax, and no rationale for deletion has been provided for the List of programs broadcast by Spacetoon (Pakistan) article, other than a subjective notion that it "needs to be deleted". Spacetoon India meets WP:CORPDEPTH. See source examples below. Also, it is possible that this company is not affiliated with Spacetoon, and exists as a standalone company. I added citation needed templates in the article accordingly and renamed the article to Spacetoon India. I also added a comment on the article's talk page regarding this matter. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:33, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of programs broadcast by Spacetoon (Pakistan) doesn't have any references at all. Besides that, there's no references that Spacetoon Pakistan even exists. If you read your references you will see that nowhere it's being referred to as TV channel but just as a licensing company.--Shinnosukeandme (talk) 04:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• @Northamerica1000: Thanks for your hard work! --David Tornheim (talk) 22:17, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Article was created by a hoaxer who was blocked right off (the behavior of edit summaries featuring only the page title in question has quickly become a hoaxer trademark). It's too poorly written, the network has no .in website (there's this site, but it looks like it dates back to 2011 and might only be a 'proof of concept' site) and all three sources listed by NA1000 aren't neutral, but are likely paid stories. I don't believe this channel exists and we're just being spun in circles by an IP hoaxer. At minimum this article needs a complete WP:TNT from a trusted editor if the network is indeed real, but this is likely yet another 'invented network' from India. Nate • (chatter) 04:44, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep both as there is obviously WP:RS for Spacetoon India, and per arguments by Northamerica1000. Please don't file frivolous WP:AfD proposals that clearly have WP:RS. Please do you due diligence. A simple Google search of Spacetoon India gives the Business Standard article and Bloomberg mentions it here. --David Tornheim (talk) 22:03, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.