Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soul Quest Overdrive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 19:58, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Soul Quest Overdrive

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant sources. This article fails the general notability guideline, which is not surprising considering the fact that this isn't a series in the regular sense; there have only been four "episodes," and all four aired on the same day. Neelix (talk) 17:07, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 23:39, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I agree that not too much turns up in the usual searches, but given that this project is a part of the well-known Aqua Teen Hunger Force family, I'd be inclined to think that at least some of the verifiable content should be preserved somewhere; for example, merged back to the main article about the property rather than deleted. --Arxiloxos (talk) 05:48, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 22:38, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:27, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Only four episodes of the series have aired in a 4 am test-slot. When the full series premieres sources will likely turn up. Grapesoda22 (talk) 20:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nominator - Wikipedia policy states that Wikipedia is not a crystal ball; a subject is not notable until a sufficient amount of information in reliable, secondary sources exists, not before. Considering the nature of this 'series', I think it unlikely that such sources will be developed. The real issue, however, is that they do not exist now. Reassessment can occur if and when more sources appear. Neelix (talk) 13:43, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and burn with fire per Neelix above. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 19:09, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, causa sui (talk) 17:00, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While I'd really love to keep this article, there just isn't enough notability here at this moment to warrant keeping this article at this point in time per the Crystal Ball rationale that Neelix posted. There's nothing here that couldn't otherwise be mentioned via the ATHF article. When/if the series gets picked up for more episodes or gets more notice, then we can add the page back. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:00, 14 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.