Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sofa ett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per G11. -- Atama頭 19:23, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sofa ett

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Art installation with no evidence of any coverage by secondary sources. Article was created by the maker of the artwork, so there are issues with conflict of interest an original research; however, I don't think the article rises to the level of spam. —C.Fred (talk) 13:40, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete as not notable. Dloh cierekim 16:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Couldn't find any independent sources to establish WP:GNG. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - as an advertisement for a made-up (and very ineptly, I might add) word and the object it refers to, by the person who created it. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:46, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
del spam, if speedy delete is denied for some reason. CombatWombat42 (talk) 17:56, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, made up by creator & no claim of significance. Just some random art student.TheLongTone (talk) 18:17, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.