Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smuggling in fiction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:14, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Smuggling in fiction

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We recently deleted the "List of media portraying drug smuggling". While this is not titled "a list of", it is de facto a POVFORK with just a tad wider scope and all the same problems. As a list, it fails WP:LISTN, as an article (which it is not), it would fail WP:GNG/WP:IPC). Another poorly referenced trivia list of works that mention topic Foo... _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:28, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Crime, Popular culture, and Lists. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:28, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a WP:CONTENTFORK of already deleted material. Article has the same problems of lacking any reliable third-party sources, this failing WP:OR, WP:GNG, and WP:NOT. Jontesta (talk) 18:20, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As a topic this seems way too broad for an encyclopedia article. BuySomeApples (talk) 21:21, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the nomination and also as failing WP:NOTTRIVIA. Without reliable sources showing how this is a notable topic, or showing how the books in question feature this prominently and not just passing mentions, this is nothing more than trivia which is unsuited to an encyclopedia. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fancruft. Shashank5988 (talk) 18:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:LISTN and WP:GNG due to inadequate sources. Seems to duplicate the unaddressed issues of a similar deleted article. Shooterwalker (talk) 12:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.