Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Six Days of the Greenery
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ‑Scottywong| verbalize _ 17:33, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Six Days of the Greenery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references for 5 years; can't find any reliable sources —Chris Capoccia T⁄C 14:01, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 21. Snotbot t • c » 17:43, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Can't find any RS to establish this as having any significance, also nominating :
- Delete. The article has no references, no assertions of notability and no reason to exist. MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:03, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.