Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon City Royals
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. JamieS93 00:39, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Simon City Royals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete as a non-notable criminal organization. Google News archives returns 0 matches and I suspect for good reason. JBsupreme (talk) 15:20, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 16:12, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 16:12, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 16:12, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Google News Archive finds 135results. Seems notable enough.--President of Internets (talk) 17:20, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The article needs tons of work but plenty of GNews and GBooks hits. Location (talk) 19:08, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The Newsweek article convinces me.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:53, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.