Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Showoff Records
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:23, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Showoff Records
- Showoff Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
GNews returns 0 hits in English (2 hits in Polish but it's not clear if the article is about "Showoff Records" or whether it is just mentioned.) Does not seem to meet the notability requirements in WP:CORP. Mr. Vernon (talk) 03:57, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Showoff Records is an independent record label, big in the hiphop underground community. Here is a write up on one of their albums released http://www.xxlmag.com/online/?p=53073 Jfreck (talk) 04:25, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. A writeup about an album released on the label is not necessarily the same as significant coverage of the label. —C.Fred (talk) 04:32, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
then here is a writeup about the record label http://www.hiphopdx.com/index/interviews/id.1493/title.the-year-of-the-showoff-part-1 http://www.hiphopdx.com/index/interviews/id.1500/title.the-year-of-the-showoff-part-2 Jfreck (talk) 04:37, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Mostly about the founder, and one article does not "significant coverage" make. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:45, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 08:54, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.