Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaquille Murray-Lawrence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 02:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shaquille Murray-Lawrence

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable athlete, fails WP:NCOLLATH. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:25, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:26, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:26, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:26, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeleteNot notable to have his own article. The Tyler Junior College doesn't even have references to their sports teams so I think we'd have to see their sports become notable , to have an article about their sports, and maybe mention the player, but having a dedicated article makes no sense for Wikipedia based on their notability. Bryce Carmony (talk) 12:35, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The Tyler Junior College article not having references to their sports team does not mean that their sports team is not notable. It may be that Wikipedia is far from complete and the article may be warranted just not yet created. It also has very little bearing on if this subject is notable. Which, by the way, I believe the subject fails WP:GNG and virtually all other notability guidelines I can find at this time (although there are a few mentions in selected articles). Subject may meet notability in the future, but I do not believe it does at this time. Therefore, I arrive at Delete but for different reasons. If any editor is enthusiastic on this subject and wishes to userfy, of course that would be accaeptable as well.--Paul McDonald (talk) 18:48, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.