Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selina Hakki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Flunitrazepam#Drug-facilitated robbery. To redirect to Flunitrazepam#Drug-facilitated robbery (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Selina Hakki

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's nothing false in this article, far as I can tell. However, it does appear to be a WP:BLP1E, and this woman is not notable outside of her crime. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 16:26, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- Bradjamesbrown (talk) 16:26, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Bradjamesbrown (talk) 16:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP1E. Textbook case of one event. There's a sentence about this in the Flunitrazepam article. That seems to be what's appropriate here.--Cube lurker (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to merge/redirect as discussed below.--Cube lurker (talk) 17:18, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ per WP:BLP1E, she is not notable for anything else. I have never heard of her before today (or completely forgotten about her), and so don't think this crime makes her notable. Redirect per Polargeo below. Martin451 (talk) 16:52, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect to Flunitrazepam#Drug-facilitated robbery. There is no gain in deleting this one outright as it is a referenced potential search term for a notable event of the use of this drug. Polargeo (talk) 16:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What's to merge? There's one line on her in that article, which is gracious plenty in my opinion, if she should even be mentioned at all. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it depends how technical we are. After this I first commented I took the reference from this article and used this to source the statement on the other article. Does that count as merging, I don't know.--Cube lurker (talk) 18:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New to all this and only contributed because a link from another wiki page was dead. - Worth noting that these were a series of crimes, the conviction was only for two sample crimes. - The crimes and criminal are noteworthy because they contravene the public understanding of the use of these drugs while they more accurately reflect the historic and verifiable use of the drugs.--Ladonamobile (talk) 17:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is not a BLP1E issue, since it is not one crime but a series, kinda like a serial killer. However, she does not generally meet WP:BIO/WP:PERP to my mind. I'm not sure that being the only woman convicted not even of using drugs but a specific one is sufficient. I'm open to a second opinion from someone more familiar with this sort of thing, though. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 21:14, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (or redirect) -- I have just altered the section in Flunitrazepam#Drug-facilitated robbery slightly and consider that the text there adequately merges this article, which has no merit of its own. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.