Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Postlethwaite

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:08, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Postlethwaite

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD; non-notable player who fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 14:18, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 14:20, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - only ever played in semi-professional leagues so fails WP:NFOOTBALL, no significant coverage found in thrid-party sources so fails WP:GNG -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:17, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- Acather96 (talk) 17:09, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:40, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - agreed, this subject doesn't meet any of the relevant guidelines. Bettia (talk) 10:44, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - hasn't even played that much semi-professional, let alone pro Spiderone 09:04, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:ATHLETE unless new refs to point to GNG can be provided. --Dweller (talk) 16:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.