Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose Bank Edu-Care High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Madhyamgram#Education. So Why 10:29, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rose Bank Edu-Care High School

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This school has absolutely no reliable secondary coverage by independent sources. The school however is verified to exist (atleast) according to this which I unearthed after lots of searching. — F R ⁺ 10:21, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:51, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:51, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Madhyamgram#Education as there is nothing to write about this school besides that it is listed in ICSE and that it is in this district. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:43, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. All high schools are notable, and references probably exist that would allow the article to be expanded, as is the case for almost all high schools. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:33, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not as it stands. Right now it's just a one-line stub that can be easily integrated into the education section. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:35, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that no other independent reliable sources can be found, given that most of the major dailies of the region are present online. — F R ⁺ 11:28, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Being a stub is not a valid reason for deletion. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:46, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

....But lack of sources is a valid reason for deletion — F R ⁺ 12:40, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.