Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roland Bíró

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 17:36, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Roland Bíró (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite being a youngster in the world. He seems to fail WP:GNG for the time being and because he is not in the Kisvarda squad it could also be WP:CRYSTAL here. HawkAussie (talk) 11:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 11:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 11:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 11:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:26, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I haven't checked my usual Hungarian news sources for this guy yet so I'm not sure about WP:GNG. He did debut only last season, though, and he is still 17. This season he is playing in the amateur third tier, as per MLSZ, the most extensive Hungarian football database. A bit concerned that he's struggling even to get game time there. No starts (kezdő), 9 sub appearances (csere) and 10 times that he sat on the bench but didn't come on (kispad). He has, however, started 4 regional U19 fixtures... Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:29, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - 17 year old at the start of his career, with one professional appearance to date so meets WP:NFOOTBALL. Needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 12:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  My question is though why does this player have their own page right here when they have made their only appearance, as a stub. Look I am saying delete right now because really we don't know if this kid would get more game time in the future as its the unknown. HawkAussie (talk) 05:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom Mushroomson (talk) 07:04, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per GiantSnowman. If it meets WP:NFOOTBALL it doesn't particularly matter if the nominator doesn't like that the subject has only a stub page. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 20:33, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and per WP:CRYSTAL. Meeting NFOOTY is not sufficient for keeping an article at AfD if GNG fails. He's a kid currently playing in an amateur Hungarian league; if it's really so important that the one sentence and infobox are retained they can be userfied until such time he actually meets GNG. JoelleJay (talk) 04:16, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Simply fails WP:GNG. Passing WP:NFOOTBALL only means that a subject is likely to pass WP:GNG but he still has to pass it. In this case, there is no WP:SIGCOV, just a single link to a database listing. Alvaldi (talk) 23:53, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Present sources are not enough to pass WP:BASIC. DmitriRomanovJr (talk) 12:56, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete we create articles on people who actually are notable now, not on the presumption they may be notable in the future.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:51, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.