Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rive-Sud Révolution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to National Ringette League. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:08, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rive-Sud Révolution

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. The only independent source in the article, [1], doesn't even mention the team. Looking for better sources didn't yield good results. Fram (talk) 08:42, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Canada. Fram (talk) 08:42, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:50, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:07, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to National Ringette League, without prejudice to re-creation if evidence of notability surfaces. Readers who search for this team should at least be sent to the article that covers the league it is part of and that mentions the team. (I note that there is a French Wikipedia equivalent to this article, but it does not look in very good shape, either.) TJRC (talk) 20:59, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to National Ringette League. An excellent solution. ProQuest search turned up 92 hits on the team, but I've quickly scanned and spot checked and they are mostly passing mentions in routine match reports and previews (very little info on the team at all, let alone sigcov...and incidentally...they seem to lose a lot). Cielquiparle (talk) 10:44, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.