Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rikin Pethani

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged BladesGodric 15:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rikin Pethani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBASKETBALL. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:18, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:34, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep With a quick google search, Rikin Pethani easily meets gng, nominator has nominated numerous Indian basketball articles for deletion with an obvious failure to perform WP:BEFORE. Geographical and demographic WP:BIAS is to be avoided; just because Indian Basketball isn't on ESPN or in Sports Illustrated, doesn't make it non-notable, but in this case it was easy to find English language sources, so it is very doubtful the nominator made a significant effort to find sources.Jacona (talk) 15:35, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:19, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep top scorer or the national championship team? Member of the national team. C'mon. FloridaArmy (talk) 04:51, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Meets GNG with quick Google search. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 21:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Easily passes GNG. Enough with the mass AfD's without doing any WP:BEFORE. Smartyllama (talk) 20:10, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.