Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Dunkley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:26, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Dunkley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 03:10, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Like you said, Backslash Forwardslash, this article is not notable. Btilm 03:46, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.
Comment. Here's a reference: http://www.tmlserver.co.uk/harlequinnews.nsf/1c1506e762a7830280257598002aa48d/981fff5ad67030b780257165004c7163!OpenDocument&Click= The article makes some claims to notability, including an award from The One Club that I cannot verify as well as photograph that appeared on the cover of the book Ravelstein, the last work from Nobel Prize winner Saul Bellow. -- Eastmain (talk) 04:55, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now Almost want to keep. If film work is completed and there are publication references of a professional level, bring it back. As it is, WP:BLP and WP:GNG as said above. Datheisen (talk) 08:02, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 13:12, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 13:12, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- the number of redlinks seems to speak for him being NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:25, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.