Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rho Capital Partners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 12:11, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rho Capital Partners (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. No references hace significant coverage so fails the general and corporation specific policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation, Finance, Organizations, Business, United States of America, and New York. UtherSRG (talk) 12:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Only found the usual routine company listings and statistics; other sources seem to be press releases. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – Most sources are just based on investment participation for other companies. Still, no significant coverage.

Toadette ^{(let's chat together)} 12:32, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:16, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No SIGCOV about the fund, beyond routine business transactions or non-independent sources. 22:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.