Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond W. Copp (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Raymond W. Copp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article clearly fails Wikipedia:Notability (people), since there is no a single secondary WP:RS that can establish a shred of notability.

Thus, I propose the article be deleted. Veverve (talk) 07:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bibliographies, Christianity, and United States of America. Veverve (talk) 07:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment There is a large web presence for this guy, although his religious credentials and affiliation seem odd to me. He's apparently a military, law enforcement, PhD psychologist, pastoral counselor, private pilot, and HAM radio operator all in Westchester PA. I hear he's going to become a partridge in a pear tree by Christmasttime. Having said all that, I do not see that the group in which he apparently holds episcopal rank is sufficiently large for that to matter per WP:BISHOPS. Jclemens (talk) 07:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete A reliable search found nothing, not a single valid ref on Gbook search, RS search, WP:BEFORE news, WP:BEFOE web. Not one valid thing of work. No indication of significance. Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 13:39, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Agree with nom that this is not an incident of WP:BISHOP. Lack of relevant reliable sourcing indicates lack of notability. I'm tempted to suggest a redirect, but I don't see this as a valid search subject. ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete For all the reasons above, and also that the creating editor "PinkyFloyd" is a suspected sock of a rather prolific sockmaster. — Maile (talk) 00:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.