Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Fabi
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 05:02, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ray Fabi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedural nomination, 3 users have Prodded, I think might meet WP:N. As I've already removed a PROD once, I figured I'd sent it off to AfD for a larger discussion. I'm neutral. Hobit (talk) 14:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as one of the prodders. Some changes have been made since then, but unless any inline citations can be provided to back up claims, then obvious delete. I'd change my mind with some WP:RS. — Timneu22 · talk 15:25, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll just point out that a lack of in-line citations isn't a reason for deletion. Hobit (talk) 16:33, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It's the lack of inline citations that could prove notability. I don't see any. — Timneu22 · talk 16:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Just being clear that in-line or not, in the article or not, is not a reason to delete. See WP:DEL. If the sources don't exist that's a different story. Hobit (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It's the lack of inline citations that could prove notability. I don't see any. — Timneu22 · talk 16:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll just point out that a lack of in-line citations isn't a reason for deletion. Hobit (talk) 16:33, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Also because the person that the article is about created. No inline citations. Mr. R00t Talk 16:38, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails, in order, WP:COMPOSER, WP:CREATIVE, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:GNG. The Daytime Emmy nomination comes closest, but no cigar. (Verifiable at [1] [2] [3]; the Emmy Awards' official website doesn't seem to list past nominees or even winners that I could find.) —Korath (Talk) 17:49, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.